There has been talking lately about Socialism and what Socialism means. Many people think that Socialism is when the government does things for them.
Socialism is not about the government doing stuff for us. The principle of Socialism is about private ownership vs. public ownership. Socialism believes that for true freedom and true equality, the only way to do this is to have the state have ownership to help the working class. Socialism believes that people should collectively work together and all share in the fruits of their labor.
Table of Contents
- Socialism Is Not About The Government Doing Free Stuff
- What Is Socialism?
- Why Pure Socialism Has Failed
- Related Questions
Socialism Is Not About The Government Doing Free Stuff
Many people think that Socialism is where the government will give you much free stuff. Under Socialism, people no longer need to work hard or be responsible for their daily lives, but the government will do it for them.
The principle of Socialism is not about the “government doing stuff” for everyone; instead, Socialism has to do with how production and ownership are viewed.
Investopedia defines Socialism as:
There is a lot of misconception as to precisely what Socialism means. Socialism is not about government programs to help you pay for things but about how production and ownership are economically viewed.
All governments do things for people, even the United States. We have a lot of government programs that are there to help people, but those programs are not considered pure Socialism.
Things like police, fire departments, infrastructure, public schools, and medicare are government programs, not socialist programs. For it to be a socialist program, it would have to be tied to production and the ownership of production to the state or government, but instead, government programs such as the police, fire department, infrastructure, and public schools are all for the public good.
What Is Socialism?
In simple terms, Socialism is a political and economic system where property and the means of production are owned in common, usually by a state government. Socialism is based on the theory that common or public ownership of resources and means of production will then lead to a more equal and equitable society.
Here are some basic facts about Socialism:
- Public Ownership – At the core of Socialism is the public, not private, ownership or control of property and resources.
- Individuals Do Not Work In Isolation – One of the core socialist views is that individuals do not live or work in isolation, but they live to be able to cooperate.
- Means Of Production Are A Social Product – Socialism believes that everything people produce should be publically owned or social.
- Everyone Shares In The Fruits Of Production – As all production is social, everyone who contributes to it is entitled to share.
- Society Owns Property To Benefit Its Citizens – Under Socialism, it is viewed that society owns all the property to benefit all its citizens.
- Socialism Is In Opposition To Capitalism – Socialism is in opposition to capitalism. Capitalism is about private property ownership, and Socialism is about government ownership of property. The two have entirely opposing and opposite views of private vs. public ownership. Socialism is opposed to the Free Market.
- Socialism Believes Capitalism Is Exploitative And Unfair – Socialism believes that capitalism is unfair and exploitative because the concentrations of wealth and power are in the hands of relatively few who can succeed in the free market system of intense competition. Socialism believes that wealth leads to power and unfair dominance in society.
- In A Free Market, The Rich Limit The Choices Of The Poor – Socialism believes that as the wealthy have power and money, they have unlimited choices that the poor do not have. As a result, individual freedom and equality are great for the rich, but it does nothing for the poor, who have limited choices due to poverty.
- Socialism Believes They Can Give Society True Freedom And True Equality – The ideal of Socialism is to raise the collective power of the working class or the poor, so they will have what the socialists see as having true freedom and true equality. Socialists believe there is true freedom and equality, which requires the state or government to control the resources that help create prosperity.
Why Pure Socialism Has Failed
Pure Socialism was once considered the ideal, but almost all countries have moved away from Socialism.
Here are some of the reasons why pure Socialism has failed:
- Incentives Matter – As people, we want to have the incentive to work hard; we believe we will get more and accomplish more than our neighbors who are not working very hard.
- Socialism Is Not Sustainable – Socialism is not sustainable over the long term as it does not inspire individuals to continue to work hard for society.
- Socialism Ignores Market Prices – As Socialism does not believe in market prices, the prices can either be too low or too high. Socialism does not care about costs or profitability.
- Socialism Does Not Look At Efficiency – Socialism is not about efficiency; in Socialism, factories often will overhire people to give them jobs. A Socialist government wants individuals to have work to do and does not care how efficient they are.
- People Like Private Ownership – In theory, Socialism may sound great to many people, but in reality, individuals and people want to feel like they own something that cannot be taken away. Having the state own your land and then telling you what you must plant does not make people feel good about their land or farm.
Ben Shapiro, the American Author, said it best when he spoke about capitalism and Socialism:
Ben Shapiro has eloquently pointed out that Socialism is about ownership and not getting free stuff. Because Socialism is about public ownership, in the end, it is capitalism that will win out.
America has a mixed economic system based mainly on capitalism and some socialist principles.
At A Bus On A Dusty Road, we talk about everything about history, travel, life, sailing, and ex-pat living. We are all about “Living Life As A Global Citizen.” We explore social, cultural, and economic issues and travel.
We would love to have you be part of our community. Sign up for our newsletter to keep up-to-date by clicking here. If you have any questions, you can contact me, Anita, by clicking here.
Listen to our Podcast called Dusty Roads. You can find it on all major podcast platforms. Try out listening to one of our podcasts by clicking here.
Subscribe to our A Bus On A Dusty Road YouTube Channel with great videos and information.
What Happened To The Hmong After The Vietnam War?
When the Vietnam War ended, the Hmong in Laos was in a terrible position; the Hmong fighters were enemies of the present Laotian government and considered “persona non gratis.” Some were forced into labor camps or kicked out of their home and lands. The Hmong eventually made their way to the Laotian – Thai border to try to get into the United States via Thailand.
By clicking here, you can discover What Happened To The Hmong After The Vietnam War?
Could America Have Won The Vietnam War?
America could not have won the Vietnam war as it never won the hearts and minds of the Vietnamese people. The Americans even had difficulty controlling the Vietnamese people in Southern Vietnam, as many were disillusioned with the Southern Vietnamese government. Ho Chi Minh, the leader of North Vietnam, fully understood that another foreign power would not control the Vietnamese heart and soul.
By clicking here, you can discover Could America Have Won The Vietnam War?
What Was The Main Reason For US Involvement In Vietnam?
The main reason for the involvement of the United States in the Vietnam War was the belief in the Domino theory; the Domino theory was a principle used to describe the effects on the world if Vietnam fell to communism. If Vietnam became communist, the rest of Asia, New Zealand, and Australia would eventually become communist. At the time, American leaders felt they were fighting for the survival of democracy throughout the world.
By clicking here, you can learn more by reading What Was The Main Reason For U.S. Involvement In Vietnam?